Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the revenue to grant full credit for TDS withheld on part payment, holding that the entire sale consideration was declared and taxed in AY 2019-20 and income cannot be taxed twice. On verification of Form 26AS for AY 2019-20 and AY 2023-24 the sale consideration matched the assessee's declaration; hence TDS deducted on subsequent part settlement must be credited. The Tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s rejection of the assessee's claim as erroneous, restored the assessee's TDS claim (including the TDS reflected for AY 2023-24) and remitted to the assessing authority/CPC to give appropriate credit under the Act.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the revenue to grant full credit for TDS withheld on part payment, holding that the entire sale consideration was declared and taxed in AY 2019-20 and income cannot be taxed twice. On verification of Form 26AS for AY 2019-20 and AY 2023-24 the sale consideration matched the assessee's declaration; hence TDS deducted on subsequent part settlement must be credited. The Tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s rejection of the assessee's claim as erroneous, restored the assessee's TDS claim (including the TDS reflected for AY 2023-24) and remitted to the assessing authority/CPC to give appropriate credit under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.