ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the revenue to grant full credit for TDS withheld on part payment, holding that the entire sale consideration was declared and taxed in AY 2019-20 and income cannot be taxed twice. On verification of Form 26AS for AY 2019-20 and AY 2023-24 the sale consideration matched the assessee's declaration; hence TDS deducted on subsequent part settlement must be credited. The Tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s rejection of the assessee's claim as erroneous, restored the assessee's TDS claim (including the TDS reflected for AY 2023-24) and remitted to the assessing authority/CPC to give appropriate credit under the Act.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the revenue to grant full credit for TDS withheld on part payment, holding that the entire sale consideration was declared and taxed in AY 2019-20 and income cannot be taxed twice. On verification of Form 26AS for AY 2019-20 and AY 2023-24 the sale consideration matched the assessee's declaration; hence TDS deducted on subsequent part settlement must be credited. The Tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s rejection of the assessee's claim as erroneous, restored the assessee's TDS claim (including the TDS reflected for AY 2023-24) and remitted to the assessing authority/CPC to give appropriate credit under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
