The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
ITAT affirmed deletion of penalty under s.271(1)(c), holding that acceptance of a s.35D deduction in an initial year, as upheld by SC precedent, precludes denial in subsequent years and that an unsustainable tax position does not ipso facto constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal applied the principle that penal liability under s.271(1)(c) requires factual proof of incorrect, erroneous or false particulars in the return, not merely an arguable or unsuccessful claim of deduction. On this basis the CIT(A)'s deletion of the penalty was upheld and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.
ITAT affirmed deletion of penalty under s.271(1)(c), holding that acceptance of a s.35D deduction in an initial year, as upheld by SC precedent, precludes denial in subsequent years and that an unsustainable tax position does not ipso facto constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal applied the principle that penal liability under s.271(1)(c) requires factual proof of incorrect, erroneous or false particulars in the return, not merely an arguable or unsuccessful claim of deduction. On this basis the CIT(A)'s deletion of the penalty was upheld and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
