Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(b) imposed on a deceased assessee is void ab initio where statutory notices were not served on or initiated against the legal heirs or legal representative. The AO's failure to bring the legal representative on record and to serve penalty notices on the heirs rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that penal consequences cannot attach to a dead person and revenue cannot recover or enforce penal sanctions against the deceased. In consequence, the penalty lacked jurisdictional basis and was set aside. The appeal of the assessee (deceased's representatives) was allowed and the penalty deleted.
The ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(b) imposed on a deceased assessee is void ab initio where statutory notices were not served on or initiated against the legal heirs or legal representative. The AO's failure to bring the legal representative on record and to serve penalty notices on the heirs rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that penal consequences cannot attach to a dead person and revenue cannot recover or enforce penal sanctions against the deceased. In consequence, the penalty lacked jurisdictional basis and was set aside. The appeal of the assessee (deceased's representatives) was allowed and the penalty deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.