Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(b) imposed on a deceased assessee is void ab initio where statutory notices were not served on or initiated against the legal heirs or legal representative. The AO's failure to bring the legal representative on record and to serve penalty notices on the heirs rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that penal consequences cannot attach to a dead person and revenue cannot recover or enforce penal sanctions against the deceased. In consequence, the penalty lacked jurisdictional basis and was set aside. The appeal of the assessee (deceased's representatives) was allowed and the penalty deleted.
The ITAT held that penalty under s.271(1)(b) imposed on a deceased assessee is void ab initio where statutory notices were not served on or initiated against the legal heirs or legal representative. The AO's failure to bring the legal representative on record and to serve penalty notices on the heirs rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal emphasized that penal consequences cannot attach to a dead person and revenue cannot recover or enforce penal sanctions against the deceased. In consequence, the penalty lacked jurisdictional basis and was set aside. The appeal of the assessee (deceased's representatives) was allowed and the penalty deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.