Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for...
Beneficial owner held liable for differential customs duty; royalties added under Rule 10(1)(c); confiscation, penalties under s.111(m), s.114A, s.112...
The HC directed that the Respondents decide the Petitioner's exemption application under the 19 Mar 2021 Circular (invoking Regulations 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations, 2009) expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks of service of the order. Pending that decision, the Respondents were restrained from demanding further cost recovery charges from the Petitioner, a Container Freight Station and custodian under Section 45, for the relevant period. If found eligible, exemption shall be applied retrospectively from the date the application was finally made free of defects. The petition is disposed of.
The HC directed that the Respondents decide the Petitioner's exemption application under the 19 Mar 2021 Circular (invoking Regulations 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations, 2009) expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks of service of the order. Pending that decision, the Respondents were restrained from demanding further cost recovery charges from the Petitioner, a Container Freight Station and custodian under Section 45, for the relevant period. If found eligible, exemption shall be applied retrospectively from the date the application was finally made free of defects. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
