Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
The AT held that Annexure A to the impugned circular created the misleading impression that the appellant presently remains a director of the expelled trading member. It was established that the trading terminals were disabled on November 7, 2018, the date of default was November 5, 2018, the trading member was expelled on May 6, 2019, and the appellant tendered resignation on November 27, 2018. The AT directed the respondent exchange to amend Annexure A to expressly state the specific date until which the appellant served as director of the expelled trading member, thereby confining the published record to the precise period of directorship to avoid ongoing reputational prejudice.
The AT held that Annexure A to the impugned circular created the misleading impression that the appellant presently remains a director of the expelled trading member. It was established that the trading terminals were disabled on November 7, 2018, the date of default was November 5, 2018, the trading member was expelled on May 6, 2019, and the appellant tendered resignation on November 27, 2018. The AT directed the respondent exchange to amend Annexure A to expressly state the specific date until which the appellant served as director of the expelled trading member, thereby confining the published record to the precise period of directorship to avoid ongoing reputational prejudice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.