Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
The AT held that Annexure A to the impugned circular created the misleading impression that the appellant presently remains a director of the expelled trading member. It was established that the trading terminals were disabled on November 7, 2018, the date of default was November 5, 2018, the trading member was expelled on May 6, 2019, and the appellant tendered resignation on November 27, 2018. The AT directed the respondent exchange to amend Annexure A to expressly state the specific date until which the appellant served as director of the expelled trading member, thereby confining the published record to the precise period of directorship to avoid ongoing reputational prejudice.
The AT held that Annexure A to the impugned circular created the misleading impression that the appellant presently remains a director of the expelled trading member. It was established that the trading terminals were disabled on November 7, 2018, the date of default was November 5, 2018, the trading member was expelled on May 6, 2019, and the appellant tendered resignation on November 27, 2018. The AT directed the respondent exchange to amend Annexure A to expressly state the specific date until which the appellant served as director of the expelled trading member, thereby confining the published record to the precise period of directorship to avoid ongoing reputational prejudice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.