The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9701 to 9720 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AT held that allegations that the appellant filed a false FIR, obtained clients' trading account details and executed trades on their behalf with improper risk profiling, and accepted cash payments were proved. The appellant's failure to inform the Board under Regulation 13(b) of the material change was thereby established in relation to the false FIR. The AT found the appellant liable under Section 15HA only and, having considered the facts and admissions, reduced the quantum of monetary penalty as sufficient to meet the ends of justice, without imposing additional statutory penalties.
AT held that allegations that the appellant filed a false FIR, obtained clients' trading account details and executed trades on their behalf with improper risk profiling, and accepted cash payments were proved. The appellant's failure to inform the Board under Regulation 13(b) of the material change was thereby established in relation to the false FIR. The AT found the appellant liable under Section 15HA only and, having considered the facts and admissions, reduced the quantum of monetary penalty as sufficient to meet the ends of justice, without imposing additional statutory penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
