Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, setting aside the impugned order and directing fresh adjudication because the petitioner was not afforded audi alteram partem due to failure to file a reply to the show cause notice. The Court found a breach of natural justice and required that the adjudicator afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and decide the matter on merits. Remand is conditional on the petitioner depositing Rs.25,000 with the Delhi GST Department as costs for delay. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with directions for expeditious re-adjudication consistent with principles of fair hearing.
HC remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, setting aside the impugned order and directing fresh adjudication because the petitioner was not afforded audi alteram partem due to failure to file a reply to the show cause notice. The Court found a breach of natural justice and required that the adjudicator afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and decide the matter on merits. Remand is conditional on the petitioner depositing Rs.25,000 with the Delhi GST Department as costs for delay. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with directions for expeditious re-adjudication consistent with principles of fair hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.