Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
HC quashed impugned show cause notices and orders issued under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, holding that invocation of the extended limitation provision requires clear allegation that non-payment, short payment, erroneous refund or wrongful ITC availing arose from fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The notices and orders failed to allege those essential elements and used language of "determination" suggesting predetermination rather than the statutory requirement to "specify" sums payable, rendering procedural source-of-liability defective. Because Section 74 was improperly invoked, the writ petition succeeds; the revenue remains at liberty to pursue recovery under other provisions, including Section 73, if legally permissible.
HC quashed impugned show cause notices and orders issued under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, holding that invocation of the extended limitation provision requires clear allegation that non-payment, short payment, erroneous refund or wrongful ITC availing arose from fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The notices and orders failed to allege those essential elements and used language of "determination" suggesting predetermination rather than the statutory requirement to "specify" sums payable, rendering procedural source-of-liability defective. Because Section 74 was improperly invoked, the writ petition succeeds; the revenue remains at liberty to pursue recovery under other provisions, including Section 73, if legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
