TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The HC allowed the petition, quashed the impugned adjudication...
Petition allowed; multiple adjudication orders and single show-cause notice quashed, directing consequential action for implementation consistent with law
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC allowed the petition, quashed the impugned adjudication orders and the show-cause notice, and directed appropriate consequential action. Specifically, the Court set aside Adjudication Order No. DCCT(Audit)-4.9/GST/DRC-7/T.No./2024-25 dated 31.08.2024 and Adjudication Order No. JCCT/DGSTO-4/ACCT(AUDIT)-4.6/GST/U-73/T/2024-25 dated 19.07.2024, together with Show Cause Notice No. ADCOM/ENF/ACCT-21/DRC-01/INS 1547/2023-24 dated 23.11.2023. The HC found disposal by quashing appropriate in the context of the issuance of a single SCN for multiple assessment years and the subsequent adjudications by different officers, and issued directions for implementation of the order consistent with law. Petition allowed; parties anonymized herein as Petitioner and Respondents.
The HC allowed the petition, quashed the impugned adjudication orders and the show-cause notice, and directed appropriate consequential action. Specifically, the Court set aside Adjudication Order No. DCCT(Audit)-4.9/GST/DRC-7/T.No./2024-25 dated 31.08.2024 and Adjudication Order No. JCCT/DGSTO-4/ACCT(AUDIT)-4.6/GST/U-73/T/2024-25 dated 19.07.2024, together with Show Cause Notice No. ADCOM/ENF/ACCT-21/DRC-01/INS 1547/2023-24 dated 23.11.2023. The HC found disposal by quashing appropriate in the context of the issuance of a single SCN for multiple assessment years and the subsequent adjudications by different officers, and issued directions for implementation of the order consistent with law. Petition allowed; parties anonymized herein as Petitioner and Respondents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
