Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that revision under s.263 was invalidly invoked where the AO, after obtaining and considering information and the assessee's explanation regarding equity shares acquired below market value under s.56(2)(x)(c), passed an assessment order adopting a plausible view. The Tribunal found the assessment neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, noting that s.263 jurisdiction requires both error and prejudice to coexist. Where the AO has investigated and taken a tenable view, mere disagreement by the PCIT does not vitiate the assessment unless the AO's view is unsustainable in law or contrary to record. Appeal of the assessee was allowed.
ITAT held that revision under s.263 was invalidly invoked where the AO, after obtaining and considering information and the assessee's explanation regarding equity shares acquired below market value under s.56(2)(x)(c), passed an assessment order adopting a plausible view. The Tribunal found the assessment neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, noting that s.263 jurisdiction requires both error and prejudice to coexist. Where the AO has investigated and taken a tenable view, mere disagreement by the PCIT does not vitiate the assessment unless the AO's view is unsustainable in law or contrary to record. Appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.