Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that revision under s.263 was invalidly invoked where the AO, after obtaining and considering information and the assessee's explanation regarding equity shares acquired below market value under s.56(2)(x)(c), passed an assessment order adopting a plausible view. The Tribunal found the assessment neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, noting that s.263 jurisdiction requires both error and prejudice to coexist. Where the AO has investigated and taken a tenable view, mere disagreement by the PCIT does not vitiate the assessment unless the AO's view is unsustainable in law or contrary to record. Appeal of the assessee was allowed.
ITAT held that revision under s.263 was invalidly invoked where the AO, after obtaining and considering information and the assessee's explanation regarding equity shares acquired below market value under s.56(2)(x)(c), passed an assessment order adopting a plausible view. The Tribunal found the assessment neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue, noting that s.263 jurisdiction requires both error and prejudice to coexist. Where the AO has investigated and taken a tenable view, mere disagreement by the PCIT does not vitiate the assessment unless the AO's view is unsustainable in law or contrary to record. Appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.