New 2025 Fourth Amendment tightens governance, executive roles and tech leadership for recognised stock exchanges, clearing corporations under 2018 Re...
ITAT allowed the appeal, directing that cash payments to unnamed sub-contractors be allowed as business expenditure. The tribunal found the assessee, engaged in tentage contracts, had substantiated payments by producing PANs, ITRs of the sub-contractors, TDS deduction and certificates, and assessment records of those recipients. Given the unregulated nature of the trade, the assessee's declared gross receipts and the relatively small quantum of payments (circa 4% of gross receipts), the tribunal held the expenditures were wholly and exclusively for business and could not be denied solely for being settled in cash; any AO misgivings should have prompted further inquiry rather than blanket disallowance.
ITAT allowed the appeal, directing that cash payments to unnamed sub-contractors be allowed as business expenditure. The tribunal found the assessee, engaged in tentage contracts, had substantiated payments by producing PANs, ITRs of the sub-contractors, TDS deduction and certificates, and assessment records of those recipients. Given the unregulated nature of the trade, the assessee's declared gross receipts and the relatively small quantum of payments (circa 4% of gross receipts), the tribunal held the expenditures were wholly and exclusively for business and could not be denied solely for being settled in cash; any AO misgivings should have prompted further inquiry rather than blanket disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
