Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudicatory tribunal's finding that the broker breached his duty to exercise due skill, care and diligence and contravened clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of the SEBI Regulations, 1992 by executing synchronized and self-trades. The tribunal's imposition of monetary penalty under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act was affirmed as proportionate and warranted given the straightforward market-manipulative nature of self-trades and the regulatory obligation on brokers to monitor client activity on internet-based trading platforms. The Court held no substantial question of law under Section 15Z was involved, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudicatory tribunal's finding that the broker breached his duty to exercise due skill, care and diligence and contravened clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct in Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of the SEBI Regulations, 1992 by executing synchronized and self-trades. The tribunal's imposition of monetary penalty under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act was affirmed as proportionate and warranted given the straightforward market-manipulative nature of self-trades and the regulatory obligation on brokers to monitor client activity on internet-based trading platforms. The Court held no substantial question of law under Section 15Z was involved, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.