Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9201 to 9220 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that the applicant is not entitled to claim input tax credit of GST charged on lease rental for land allotted for construction of an industrial unit, as such credit is specifically barred by section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The bar applies irrespective of timing (pre-construction or post-construction), to any vacant portion of the leased land reserved for the project, and extends to amounts attributable to reconstruction, renovation, addition, alteration or repairs, since "construction" encompasses those activities. The Authority rejected attempts to limit section 17(5)(d) by reference to nexus or to section 17(5)(c), noting both clauses operate independently.
AAR held that the applicant is not entitled to claim input tax credit of GST charged on lease rental for land allotted for construction of an industrial unit, as such credit is specifically barred by section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The bar applies irrespective of timing (pre-construction or post-construction), to any vacant portion of the leased land reserved for the project, and extends to amounts attributable to reconstruction, renovation, addition, alteration or repairs, since "construction" encompasses those activities. The Authority rejected attempts to limit section 17(5)(d) by reference to nexus or to section 17(5)(c), noting both clauses operate independently.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
