ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
AAR held that fusible interlining fabric composed of 85% or more cotton is classifiable under Chapter 52 of the Tariff Schedule. Relying on the legal effect of the Tribunal's prior order and Circular No. 5/89 concerning the treatment of fusible interlinings before the insertion and after deletion of Note 2(c) to Chapter 59, the Authority concluded that such goods are to be classified according to their predominant textile material; where cotton predominates, Chapter 52 applies. The applicant's submitted laboratory test establishing textile composition governed the classification outcome, resulting in duty treatment and tariff classification under Chapter 52.
AAR held that fusible interlining fabric composed of 85% or more cotton is classifiable under Chapter 52 of the Tariff Schedule. Relying on the legal effect of the Tribunal's prior order and Circular No. 5/89 concerning the treatment of fusible interlinings before the insertion and after deletion of Note 2(c) to Chapter 59, the Authority concluded that such goods are to be classified according to their predominant textile material; where cotton predominates, Chapter 52 applies. The applicant's submitted laboratory test establishing textile composition governed the classification outcome, resulting in duty treatment and tariff classification under Chapter 52.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
