Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC affirmed the penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS, holding that the assessee's appeal fails because the purported loan was not accepted as genuine and had been treated as income under section 68. The court found the appellant's arguments devoid of merit and held that non-acceptance of the loan does not negate the imposition of penalty where cash receipts were returned/deposited in the manner alleged. The question of law was answered against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue; the penalty is sustained and the appeal is dismissed with no relief to the appellant.
The HC affirmed the penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS, holding that the assessee's appeal fails because the purported loan was not accepted as genuine and had been treated as income under section 68. The court found the appellant's arguments devoid of merit and held that non-acceptance of the loan does not negate the imposition of penalty where cash receipts were returned/deposited in the manner alleged. The question of law was answered against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue; the penalty is sustained and the appeal is dismissed with no relief to the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.