Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed the penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS, holding that the assessee's appeal fails because the purported loan was not accepted as genuine and had been treated as income under section 68. The court found the appellant's arguments devoid of merit and held that non-acceptance of the loan does not negate the imposition of penalty where cash receipts were returned/deposited in the manner alleged. The question of law was answered against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue; the penalty is sustained and the appeal is dismissed with no relief to the appellant.
The HC affirmed the penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS, holding that the assessee's appeal fails because the purported loan was not accepted as genuine and had been treated as income under section 68. The court found the appellant's arguments devoid of merit and held that non-acceptance of the loan does not negate the imposition of penalty where cash receipts were returned/deposited in the manner alleged. The question of law was answered against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue; the penalty is sustained and the appeal is dismissed with no relief to the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.