The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9701 to 9720 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the foreign taxpayer (a UK tax resident) and held that amounts received for provision of proprietary e-invoicing software and incidental training do not constitute "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA. Relying on the HC's analysis, the tribunal found the requisite "make available" condition absent because the training merely enabled use of the taxpayer's e-platform and did not transfer technical know-how, processes, or rights that would allow the recipient to independently render the invoicing service. Consequently, such receipts do not accrue or arise in India as FTS and are not chargeable to tax under the Act.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the foreign taxpayer (a UK tax resident) and held that amounts received for provision of proprietary e-invoicing software and incidental training do not constitute "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA. Relying on the HC's analysis, the tribunal found the requisite "make available" condition absent because the training merely enabled use of the taxpayer's e-platform and did not transfer technical know-how, processes, or rights that would allow the recipient to independently render the invoicing service. Consequently, such receipts do not accrue or arise in India as FTS and are not chargeable to tax under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
