Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
ITAT held that the revised return operated as a substitution for the original return and, as the AO assessed income identical to the revised return and accepted the assessee's explanations, there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; accordingly penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be levied. The tribunal reversed the penalty order, finding that once tax was recovered on the revised return and no material demonstrated falsehood or suppression in the particulars furnished, the statutory requirement for imposing penalty was not satisfied. Appeal allowed and penalty set aside.
ITAT held that the revised return operated as a substitution for the original return and, as the AO assessed income identical to the revised return and accepted the assessee's explanations, there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars; accordingly penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be levied. The tribunal reversed the penalty order, finding that once tax was recovered on the revised return and no material demonstrated falsehood or suppression in the particulars furnished, the statutory requirement for imposing penalty was not satisfied. Appeal allowed and penalty set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
