Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that the show-cause notice invoking the extended limitation under s.28, Customs Act, 1962, was time-barred and declined to adjudicate the merits. The tribunal noted departmental ambiguity on tariff classification of TV tuners during the relevant period and that the impugned order itself adopted a different CTH than initially assessed. Applying the principle that a time-barred demand precludes merit adjudication, as affirmed by higher courts, CESTAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, thereby quashing the demand insofar as it was raised beyond the statutory period against the Appellant and dismissing the Revenue's extended limitation plea.
CESTAT held that the show-cause notice invoking the extended limitation under s.28, Customs Act, 1962, was time-barred and declined to adjudicate the merits. The tribunal noted departmental ambiguity on tariff classification of TV tuners during the relevant period and that the impugned order itself adopted a different CTH than initially assessed. Applying the principle that a time-barred demand precludes merit adjudication, as affirmed by higher courts, CESTAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, thereby quashing the demand insofar as it was raised beyond the statutory period against the Appellant and dismissing the Revenue's extended limitation plea.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
