Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
The AT dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's admitted failure to comply with LODR obligations (Regns. 52, 52(2), 52(4) and 54(2)) and subsequent conduct - seeking BSE approval for NCD modifications only after prolonged default, furnishing a bank guarantee to cover SOP fines, then challenging the levies post-approval - constituted misrepresentation and justified the imposition of time-based fines for delays of 45 to 904 days. The tribunal upheld BSE's reduction of fines to Rs.1.62 crore on waiver consideration and rejected the double jeopardy plea, finding SEBI and the stock exchange regulate distinct spheres. The appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.
The AT dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's admitted failure to comply with LODR obligations (Regns. 52, 52(2), 52(4) and 54(2)) and subsequent conduct - seeking BSE approval for NCD modifications only after prolonged default, furnishing a bank guarantee to cover SOP fines, then challenging the levies post-approval - constituted misrepresentation and justified the imposition of time-based fines for delays of 45 to 904 days. The tribunal upheld BSE's reduction of fines to Rs.1.62 crore on waiver consideration and rejected the double jeopardy plea, finding SEBI and the stock exchange regulate distinct spheres. The appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
