Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT allowed the appeals, holding that the inter-scheme transfers (ISTs) undertaken by the AMC did not contravene applicable MF Regulations or the July 27, 2000 circular. The Tribunal found ISTs permissible, specific conditions in Schedule-VII and due-diligence processes were satisfied, reasons were recorded, and no fresh market purchases were made; there was no evidence of private gain, integrity breaches by trustees/AMC, or proven contravention of Para-6 or Para-8. Applying the principle generalia specialibus non derogant, specific IST provisions prevailed over general code provisions, and the Assessing Officer could not substitute his judgment for professional investment decisions. Appeals accordingly allowed.
The AT allowed the appeals, holding that the inter-scheme transfers (ISTs) undertaken by the AMC did not contravene applicable MF Regulations or the July 27, 2000 circular. The Tribunal found ISTs permissible, specific conditions in Schedule-VII and due-diligence processes were satisfied, reasons were recorded, and no fresh market purchases were made; there was no evidence of private gain, integrity breaches by trustees/AMC, or proven contravention of Para-6 or Para-8. Applying the principle generalia specialibus non derogant, specific IST provisions prevailed over general code provisions, and the Assessing Officer could not substitute his judgment for professional investment decisions. Appeals accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
