ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
HC granted bail to the accused in respect of alleged offences under clauses (b), (c), (f) and (l) of Section 132(1) of the CGST Act, which attract maximum imprisonment of five years and fine. The Court observed the prosecution case is documentary and electronic, the allegations of wrongful availment/passing of ITC totalling Rs.23.66 crore remain to be proved, and prolonged pre-trial detention (in custody since 28.01.2025) is unwarranted given the right to speedy trial and the principle that bail is the norm. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate and compliance with imposed conditions.
HC granted bail to the accused in respect of alleged offences under clauses (b), (c), (f) and (l) of Section 132(1) of the CGST Act, which attract maximum imprisonment of five years and fine. The Court observed the prosecution case is documentary and electronic, the allegations of wrongful availment/passing of ITC totalling Rs.23.66 crore remain to be proved, and prolonged pre-trial detention (in custody since 28.01.2025) is unwarranted given the right to speedy trial and the principle that bail is the norm. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate and compliance with imposed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
