Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that CPC's mechanical denial of concessional rate under s.115BAB by making adjustments u/s 143(1) without affording an opportunity of hearing violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found CPC erred in applying the normal 30% rate in place of the concessional 22% where the assessee's eligibility - linked to commencement date and nature of manufacturing - could not be determined absent a hearing, particularly when the same claim was accepted in the preceding year. The ITAT set aside the CPC adjustment and the CIT(A) order upholding it, and directed that the matter be reconsidered consistent with law after giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that CPC's mechanical denial of concessional rate under s.115BAB by making adjustments u/s 143(1) without affording an opportunity of hearing violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found CPC erred in applying the normal 30% rate in place of the concessional 22% where the assessee's eligibility - linked to commencement date and nature of manufacturing - could not be determined absent a hearing, particularly when the same claim was accepted in the preceding year. The ITAT set aside the CPC adjustment and the CIT(A) order upholding it, and directed that the matter be reconsidered consistent with law after giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.