Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the addition of capital gains to the taxpayer's individual assessment was unsustainable and allowed the appeal. The Tribunal found, on the basis of the will, sale deed and bank receipts, that the immovable property was owned and sold by the taxpayer's HUF and trust, not by the taxpayer in his individual capacity; the tax authority failed to rebut these documentary facts. The Tribunal rejected reliance on the mere mention of the taxpayer's PAN on the sale registration as insufficient to establish individual ownership. Consequently, the capital gains could not be taxed in the taxpayer's hands and the addition was set aside.
ITAT held that the addition of capital gains to the taxpayer's individual assessment was unsustainable and allowed the appeal. The Tribunal found, on the basis of the will, sale deed and bank receipts, that the immovable property was owned and sold by the taxpayer's HUF and trust, not by the taxpayer in his individual capacity; the tax authority failed to rebut these documentary facts. The Tribunal rejected reliance on the mere mention of the taxpayer's PAN on the sale registration as insufficient to establish individual ownership. Consequently, the capital gains could not be taxed in the taxpayer's hands and the addition was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.