Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it...
ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallowed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it represents the FMV-issue price differential and noting compliance with SEBI guidelines and binding coordinate-bench precedent, thereby reversing the AO's disallowance. The Tribunal restored the long-term capital gain/loss issue arising from sale of land to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing the AO/CIT(A) to obtain the collector/circle rate as at the relevant date and afford both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. Additions on account of deferred income/time-share revenue were disallowed in view of the assessee's consistent revenue recognition policy deferring 55% and treating 45% as current income, in line with earlier Tribunal findings.
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it represents the FMV-issue price differential and noting compliance with SEBI guidelines and binding coordinate-bench precedent, thereby reversing the AO's disallowance. The Tribunal restored the long-term capital gain/loss issue arising from sale of land to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing the AO/CIT(A) to obtain the collector/circle rate as at the relevant date and afford both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. Additions on account of deferred income/time-share revenue were disallowed in view of the assessee's consistent revenue recognition policy deferring 55% and treating 45% as current income, in line with earlier Tribunal findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.