Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it...
ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallowed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it represents the FMV-issue price differential and noting compliance with SEBI guidelines and binding coordinate-bench precedent, thereby reversing the AO's disallowance. The Tribunal restored the long-term capital gain/loss issue arising from sale of land to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing the AO/CIT(A) to obtain the collector/circle rate as at the relevant date and afford both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. Additions on account of deferred income/time-share revenue were disallowed in view of the assessee's consistent revenue recognition policy deferring 55% and treating 45% as current income, in line with earlier Tribunal findings.
The ITAT allowed the ESOP expenditure deduction, observing it represents the FMV-issue price differential and noting compliance with SEBI guidelines and binding coordinate-bench precedent, thereby reversing the AO's disallowance. The Tribunal restored the long-term capital gain/loss issue arising from sale of land to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, directing the AO/CIT(A) to obtain the collector/circle rate as at the relevant date and afford both parties opportunity to adduce evidence. Additions on account of deferred income/time-share revenue were disallowed in view of the assessee's consistent revenue recognition policy deferring 55% and treating 45% as current income, in line with earlier Tribunal findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.