Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9201 to 9220 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT allowed the appeal and directed the RP to classify the appellant as a secured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the bank had established a security interest by cash collateral in fixed deposits bearing lien endorsements in its favour supporting a non-fund based facility; absence of a separate sanction order did not negate the secured status where the corporate debtor applied for the facility and fixed deposit particulars were on record. The adjudicating authority's order compelling release of amounts held as security was set aside. No evidentiary basis existed to infer waiver by the bank of its liened fixed deposits securing the facility.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and directed the RP to classify the appellant as a secured financial creditor. The Tribunal held that the bank had established a security interest by cash collateral in fixed deposits bearing lien endorsements in its favour supporting a non-fund based facility; absence of a separate sanction order did not negate the secured status where the corporate debtor applied for the facility and fixed deposit particulars were on record. The adjudicating authority's order compelling release of amounts held as security was set aside. No evidentiary basis existed to infer waiver by the bank of its liened fixed deposits securing the facility.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
