Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC dismissed the writ petitions subject to conditions: the Appellate Authority's initial rejection of an appeal for failure to make the mandatory pre-deposit was upheld as valid, and a subsequent belated appeal was held time-barred; res judicata did not apply because the first appeal was not an appeal in law. The petitions are disposed by directing restoration of the appeal before the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order, failing which the Appellate Authority may proceed in accordance with law.
The HC dismissed the writ petitions subject to conditions: the Appellate Authority's initial rejection of an appeal for failure to make the mandatory pre-deposit was upheld as valid, and a subsequent belated appeal was held time-barred; res judicata did not apply because the first appeal was not an appeal in law. The petitions are disposed by directing restoration of the appeal before the Appellate Authority provided the petitioner deposits 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within 30 days of receipt of the order, failing which the Appellate Authority may proceed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
