PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the statutory regime: Rule 3 of the Jammu & Kashmir Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017 compels both manufacturers and dealers to hold licences; the licensing scheme is substantive and applies equally to dealers, including those transporting bricks from outside the UT. Deputy Commissioners, notified as licensing authorities, acted within statutory powers under the Act in ordering seizures, confiscations and penalties; their actions were neither mala fide nor procedurally defective. GST registration does not supplant the licence requirement. The writ was held premature given available statutory remedies and no demonstrable excess of jurisdiction; the regulatory restriction does not violate Article 19(1)(g). Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the statutory regime: Rule 3 of the Jammu & Kashmir Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017 compels both manufacturers and dealers to hold licences; the licensing scheme is substantive and applies equally to dealers, including those transporting bricks from outside the UT. Deputy Commissioners, notified as licensing authorities, acted within statutory powers under the Act in ordering seizures, confiscations and penalties; their actions were neither mala fide nor procedurally defective. GST registration does not supplant the licence requirement. The writ was held premature given available statutory remedies and no demonstrable excess of jurisdiction; the regulatory restriction does not violate Article 19(1)(g). Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.