Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
The SC dismissed the SLP, upholding the HC's affirmance of the ITAT's factual conclusion that the AO's addition of alleged outstanding liabilities payable to two banks to the assessee's returned income was justified. The Court held the genuineness and existence of the claimed transactions were questions of fact, noting the absence of sufficient evidentiary material to demonstrate receipt (and subsequent return) of goods or to substantiate the asserted liabilities. No perversity or patent illegality in the concurrent findings of fact was found, and there was no basis to interfere with the impugned HC order sustaining the addition.
The SC dismissed the SLP, upholding the HC's affirmance of the ITAT's factual conclusion that the AO's addition of alleged outstanding liabilities payable to two banks to the assessee's returned income was justified. The Court held the genuineness and existence of the claimed transactions were questions of fact, noting the absence of sufficient evidentiary material to demonstrate receipt (and subsequent return) of goods or to substantiate the asserted liabilities. No perversity or patent illegality in the concurrent findings of fact was found, and there was no basis to interfere with the impugned HC order sustaining the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.