ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
The ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were void ab initio for want of jurisdiction: the AO failed to record cogent reasons or identify tangible material establishing escapement of income before issuing notice, despite knowledge that the assessee was a non-resident foreign company, a TRC holder and SEBI-FPI investor in NCDs whose sole Indian receipts were interest subjected to TDS u/s 194LD. Absent findings of a PE in India or applicability of POEM/s 6(3), there was no obligation to file a return u/s 139(1), and DTAA protections applied. Consequently the ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds and set aside the reassessment initiation.
The ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were void ab initio for want of jurisdiction: the AO failed to record cogent reasons or identify tangible material establishing escapement of income before issuing notice, despite knowledge that the assessee was a non-resident foreign company, a TRC holder and SEBI-FPI investor in NCDs whose sole Indian receipts were interest subjected to TDS u/s 194LD. Absent findings of a PE in India or applicability of POEM/s 6(3), there was no obligation to file a return u/s 139(1), and DTAA protections applied. Consequently the ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds and set aside the reassessment initiation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
