Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned AA order and upheld approval of the resolution plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant, holding it received the requisite approvals under Section 30(4). The Tribunal directed admission of the additional MCA email into the record, found the AA's disqualification findings under Section 29A clauses (c), (e), (g), (i) and (j) to be unsustainable, and held the SRA eligible. The Tribunal held the third-party deposit of the Performance Bank Guarantee did not contravene Regulation 36B(4A), found Regulation 38(3) inapplicable as relied upon, and concluded net-worth criteria under the RFRP were satisfied. The appeal was disposed and the AA order dated 22.07.2025 set aside.
NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned AA order and upheld approval of the resolution plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant, holding it received the requisite approvals under Section 30(4). The Tribunal directed admission of the additional MCA email into the record, found the AA's disqualification findings under Section 29A clauses (c), (e), (g), (i) and (j) to be unsustainable, and held the SRA eligible. The Tribunal held the third-party deposit of the Performance Bank Guarantee did not contravene Regulation 36B(4A), found Regulation 38(3) inapplicable as relied upon, and concluded net-worth criteria under the RFRP were satisfied. The appeal was disposed and the AA order dated 22.07.2025 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
