Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT affirmed admission of the Section 7 petition, holding that the MoU's Clause 6 effected an automatic event of default upon non-payment within the 45-day cure period, which expired on 16.03.2020, thereby terminating the compromise and vesting the Financial Creditor with entitlement to recover outstanding dues. Subsequent payments and a separate WCTL-III disbursement did not revive the lapsed MoU or cure the Term Loan default, and Clause 4.2's discretionary "may" did not amount to waiver. The Tribunal found a subsisting financial debt and continuing default predating Section 10A; equitable considerations were irrelevant at admission. Impugned order stood unassailable and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT affirmed admission of the Section 7 petition, holding that the MoU's Clause 6 effected an automatic event of default upon non-payment within the 45-day cure period, which expired on 16.03.2020, thereby terminating the compromise and vesting the Financial Creditor with entitlement to recover outstanding dues. Subsequent payments and a separate WCTL-III disbursement did not revive the lapsed MoU or cure the Term Loan default, and Clause 4.2's discretionary "may" did not amount to waiver. The Tribunal found a subsisting financial debt and continuing default predating Section 10A; equitable considerations were irrelevant at admission. Impugned order stood unassailable and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
