Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC held that the resultant steam-generating plant, assembled on site from CKD consignments and bought-out items, constitutes an immovable product and therefore does not qualify as "excisable goods" under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the value of duty-paid bought-out items delivered directly to the buyer's site cannot be included in the assessable value of the boiler cleared from the factory. The SC further held that the proviso to Section 11A(1) was inapplicable as there was no evidence of wilful misstatement, suppression or intent to evade duty, rendering the show-cause notice issued under the extended period invalid. Appeal allowed; impugned notice quashed.
The SC held that the resultant steam-generating plant, assembled on site from CKD consignments and bought-out items, constitutes an immovable product and therefore does not qualify as "excisable goods" under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the value of duty-paid bought-out items delivered directly to the buyer's site cannot be included in the assessable value of the boiler cleared from the factory. The SC further held that the proviso to Section 11A(1) was inapplicable as there was no evidence of wilful misstatement, suppression or intent to evade duty, rendering the show-cause notice issued under the extended period invalid. Appeal allowed; impugned notice quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.