Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's orders and affirming that no violation of natural justice occurred as the appellant was afforded multiple opportunities yet repeatedly delayed proceedings and failed to controvert the factual matrix. The Tribunal held that alleged fraudulent share transactions by the appellant, a KMP, demonstrated intent to defraud creditors and vitiated the impugned transactions, thereby invoking Section 66(1) of the Code. The court rejected the contention that Section 66(1) cannot operate absent Section 66(2), observing prior authority addressed only Section 66(2) and does not preclude independent operation of Section 66(1). Appeal dismissed with impugned orders sustained.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's orders and affirming that no violation of natural justice occurred as the appellant was afforded multiple opportunities yet repeatedly delayed proceedings and failed to controvert the factual matrix. The Tribunal held that alleged fraudulent share transactions by the appellant, a KMP, demonstrated intent to defraud creditors and vitiated the impugned transactions, thereby invoking Section 66(1) of the Code. The court rejected the contention that Section 66(1) cannot operate absent Section 66(2), observing prior authority addressed only Section 66(2) and does not preclude independent operation of Section 66(1). Appeal dismissed with impugned orders sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
