Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment orders. The Tribunal found the appellants failed to disclose the source of funds for property acquisitions, discredited their witness-statements and uncorroborated explanations, and determined agricultural receipts and firm income could not account for the purchases. The AT accepted the enforcement analysis of declared income and banking transactions, including use of third-party accounts to funnel cash, and concluded proceeds of crime were either not traceable or vanished; accordingly, properties of equivalent value, including some acquired prior to the predicate acts, were lawfully provisionally attached as "proceeds of crime." The challenge to linkage with the alleged predicate offence and related notifications was rejected. Appeal dismissed.
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment orders. The Tribunal found the appellants failed to disclose the source of funds for property acquisitions, discredited their witness-statements and uncorroborated explanations, and determined agricultural receipts and firm income could not account for the purchases. The AT accepted the enforcement analysis of declared income and banking transactions, including use of third-party accounts to funnel cash, and concluded proceeds of crime were either not traceable or vanished; accordingly, properties of equivalent value, including some acquired prior to the predicate acts, were lawfully provisionally attached as "proceeds of crime." The challenge to linkage with the alleged predicate offence and related notifications was rejected. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
