Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9201 to 9220 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration dated 26.08.2024, holding that the sole deficiency-non-uploading of bank account details-was not of such gravity as to warrant cancellation, and that the show-cause notice was vague, failed to specify the alleged defaults or afford a cure period, and lacked proof of effective service. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application before the respondent for revival of registration, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and deposit of any applicable late fees, fines or penalties. Petition allowed; revival conditional upon payment and fulfillment of requisite formalities.
The HC set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration dated 26.08.2024, holding that the sole deficiency-non-uploading of bank account details-was not of such gravity as to warrant cancellation, and that the show-cause notice was vague, failed to specify the alleged defaults or afford a cure period, and lacked proof of effective service. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application before the respondent for revival of registration, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and deposit of any applicable late fees, fines or penalties. Petition allowed; revival conditional upon payment and fulfillment of requisite formalities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
