ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
The HC set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration dated 26.08.2024, holding that the sole deficiency-non-uploading of bank account details-was not of such gravity as to warrant cancellation, and that the show-cause notice was vague, failed to specify the alleged defaults or afford a cure period, and lacked proof of effective service. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application before the respondent for revival of registration, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and deposit of any applicable late fees, fines or penalties. Petition allowed; revival conditional upon payment and fulfillment of requisite formalities.
The HC set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration dated 26.08.2024, holding that the sole deficiency-non-uploading of bank account details-was not of such gravity as to warrant cancellation, and that the show-cause notice was vague, failed to specify the alleged defaults or afford a cure period, and lacked proof of effective service. The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application before the respondent for revival of registration, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and deposit of any applicable late fees, fines or penalties. Petition allowed; revival conditional upon payment and fulfillment of requisite formalities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
