Notification No. 12/97-Customs(N.T.) amendment adds Malur Inland Container Depot in Karnataka to authorized locations for import unloading and export ...
Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.