Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the second rectification application as not maintainable and sustained the revenue's objection. The Tribunal held that where a rectification petition filed by one party has been considered and decided by the Tribunal under s.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, a subsequent rectification by either party on the same issue (here, eligibility for SSI threshold exemption) cannot be entertained; a second rectification is permissible only in respect of matters not earlier adjudicated in any rectification application by either party. Consequently, the second rectification was rejected and the application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
