Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9201 to 9220 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that, in line with the Del HC precedent, receipts from hiring rigs for prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil fall within the special computation regime of s.44BB, thereby excluding application of s.9(1)(vi). The tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO and directed the AO to compute the assessee's income for the assessment years in dispute exclusively under s.44BB. The assessment framed by applying s.9(1)(vi) was set aside and the matter remitted for recomputation in accordance with s.44BB.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that, in line with the Del HC precedent, receipts from hiring rigs for prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil fall within the special computation regime of s.44BB, thereby excluding application of s.9(1)(vi). The tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO and directed the AO to compute the assessee's income for the assessment years in dispute exclusively under s.44BB. The assessment framed by applying s.9(1)(vi) was set aside and the matter remitted for recomputation in accordance with s.44BB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
