Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the immovable properties were "transferred" within the meaning of s. 2(47)(vi) of the Act. The tribunal accepted the appellate authority's finding that the retired partner enjoyed and used the properties for business purposes post-retirement and received the entire sale consideration, establishing beneficial ownership despite registration remaining in the assessee's records. Consequently, capital gains arising from the transfer are assessable in the hands of the retired partner, not the assessee, and the absence of a return disclosing the gain by the retired partner does not justify taxing the assessee. Appeal of the Revenue rejected.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the immovable properties were "transferred" within the meaning of s. 2(47)(vi) of the Act. The tribunal accepted the appellate authority's finding that the retired partner enjoyed and used the properties for business purposes post-retirement and received the entire sale consideration, establishing beneficial ownership despite registration remaining in the assessee's records. Consequently, capital gains arising from the transfer are assessable in the hands of the retired partner, not the assessee, and the absence of a return disclosing the gain by the retired partner does not justify taxing the assessee. Appeal of the Revenue rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.