Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the immovable properties were "transferred" within the meaning of s. 2(47)(vi) of the Act. The tribunal accepted the appellate authority's finding that the retired partner enjoyed and used the properties for business purposes post-retirement and received the entire sale consideration, establishing beneficial ownership despite registration remaining in the assessee's records. Consequently, capital gains arising from the transfer are assessable in the hands of the retired partner, not the assessee, and the absence of a return disclosing the gain by the retired partner does not justify taxing the assessee. Appeal of the Revenue rejected.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the immovable properties were "transferred" within the meaning of s. 2(47)(vi) of the Act. The tribunal accepted the appellate authority's finding that the retired partner enjoyed and used the properties for business purposes post-retirement and received the entire sale consideration, establishing beneficial ownership despite registration remaining in the assessee's records. Consequently, capital gains arising from the transfer are assessable in the hands of the retired partner, not the assessee, and the absence of a return disclosing the gain by the retired partner does not justify taxing the assessee. Appeal of the Revenue rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
