Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as compliant with standards
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.