Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as compliant with standards
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.