Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as compliant with standards
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the income addition made by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee's method of revenue recognition on project-completion basis conformed with the Guidance Note/AS-9 requirement that revenue be recognized only when all significant risks and rewards of ownership transfer, and that percentage-completion accounting applies only where the contract's economic substance is that of a construction contract. Revenue failed to rebut the assessee's evidence and did not demonstrate that the agreements effected transfer of risks and rewards or that the project had the requisite certainty and contractual character of a construction contract; accordingly the AO's addition was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.